Sermon

Judgment Day

The Rev. Jack D. Bryant

Hope Unitarian Church

October 19, 2003

 

First Reading:  Malachi 4:1-3  See, the day is coming, burning like an oven, when all the arrogant and all evildoers will be stubble; the day that comes shall burn them up, says the Lord of hosts, so that it will leave them neither root nor branch.  But for you who revere my name, the sun of righteousness shall rise, with healing in its wings.  You shall go out leaping likes calves from the stall.  And you shall tread down the wicked, for they will be ashes under the soles of your feet, on the day when I act, says the Lord of hosts.

Acts 17:30-31:  Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent, because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained.

2 Peter 3:4,7:  Knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, Where is the promise of His coming?  For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation…  But the heavens and earth which now exist are kept in store by the same word, reserved for fire until the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

Romans 14:11-12:  For it is written:  As I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bow to Me, and every tongue shall confess to God.  So then each of us shall give account of Himself to God.

Matthew 12:36-37: 

But I say to you that for every idle word men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgment.  For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.

 

Second Reading:  Ralph Waldo Emerson.  “Spiritual Laws”

A man passes for that he is worth.  Very idle is all curiosity concerning other people’s estimate of us, and all fear of remaining unknown is not less so.  If a man knows that he can do any thing — that he can do it better than any one else — he has a pledge of the acknowledgment of that fact by all persons.  The world is full of judgment days, and into every assembly that a man enters, in every action he attempts, he is gauged and stamped.  In every troop of boys that whoop and run in each yard and square, a new comer is as well and accurately weighed in the course of a few days, and stamped with his right number, as if he had undergone a formal trial of his strength, speed, and temper.  A stranger comes from a distant school, with better dress, with trinkets in his pockets, with airs and pretensions: an older boy says to himself, ‘It’s of no use: we shall find him out tomorrow.’  ‘What has he done?’ is the divine question which searches men, and transpierces every false reputation.  A fop may sit in any chair of the world, nor be distinguished for his hour from Homer and Washington; but there need never be any doubt concerning the respective ability of human beings.  Pretension may sit still, but cannot act.  Pretension never feigned an act of real greatness.  Pretension never wrote an Iliad, nor drove back Xerxes, nor christianized the world, nor abolished slavery.

Sermon

I watched the California recall election with a sense of morbid fascination.  I say “morbid” because even if Grey Davis is unworthy to be governor of California, I believe the recall was an example of a bad process run amuck.  Regardless of who holds the office, I believe elected officials should serve out their term – unless they have committed such high crimes and misdemeanors that they are eligible to serve a different kind of term.  Whatever Mr. Davis’s shortcomings might be – and from the little I’ve read I believe there’s reason to say they are numerous –that wasn’t the case in California – so as a matter of principle I believe the voters should have reserved judgment on Mr. Davis until the next regularly scheduled election. 

But regardless of the political merits of what happened, I found the whole process fascinating – especially because Arnold Schwarzenegger was running – because what was playing out in California was a kind of judgment day, a theme in several of his movies.  The second Terminator movie, for example, is subtitled, “Judgment Day.”  That’s also the theme of End of Days, a movie Mr. Schwarzenegger made a few years ago.  In the movie, the protagonist is a retired policeman who is trying to prevent Satan from winning the battle of the Apocalypse, the final battle between good and evil.  Given its topic, that movie might also have been titled “Judgment Day.”

The idea of a “Judgment Day” is a persistent theme in our culture.  It is an idea that has its roots in the concept of history.  For most of human history, people have perceived time as circular.  You solve life’s problems by going back to the beginning and starting over.  But three thousand years ago the people of Yahweh – the people who became the Jews – invented history.  Instead of time – and the world – going in circles, they envisioned a world in which time was linear.  There was a beginning, and – if not an end – at least a direction towards which everything moved.  And that direction, the course of history, was under the control of God. 

There was only one problem.  Because they understood God as being in absolute control of the world, they could not understand why the world wasn’t perfect.  They couldn’t understand why good people suffered and bad people prospered.  At the time of Jesus, the Jews couldn’t understand why the Roman Empire didn’t crumble before God’s plan for history.  After all, the Jews were supposed to be God’s chosen people. 

This led some people to speculate that while history was linear, that it was moving in a straight line, that somehow the world had gotten off track.  The solution, they decided, was the apocalypse – an intervention in the world by God, which would set everything right.  The right way, the godly way, would be revealed, and the world would start going in the proper direction.  The word apocalypse was the term used to describe this sudden change in the world – a word that means – in the original Greek – a pulling back of the curtains, a revelation of what has been hidden.  And because the world had been going in the wrong direction, it would, of course, be necessary for the world to be judged in light of the truth that would be revealed in the apocalypse.  There would be a judgment day – and after that day – after the world had been judged, all would be as it should be:  The good would prosper and the wicked would receive the punishment they deserved; God would be in her heaven and all would be right with the world.  It was against the backdrop of this kind of thinking that Jesus lived out his ministry and his followers, after his death, fashioned the religion that we know today as Christianity – a religion that shaped and molded western culture.

During the first century it was believed that the end of the world, the apocalypse, would come within the lifetime of those then living.  However, it still hasn’t happened.  Not that some people aren’t wishing for it.  Do you remember the Y2K business?  This time three years ago you could get a really good deal on unused generators and emergency food supplies.  But not to be denied, many people have substituted the idea of individual judgment for a worldwide apocalypse.  Hence the widespread belief that on the day you die you will find yourself being judged before almighty God herself – or her designated agent. 

One of my favorite cartoons on the subject of personal judgment is one I saw just a few months ago.  It shows a man standing before the heavenly bench of justice with a surprised and uncomfortable look on his face – surprised because it is a woman sitting in judgment – uncomfortable because he recognizes her.  He looks at her and says, “Why, Margaret, fancy meeting you here.”  She stares back at him without a word, but with a withering look that says the man is about to receive a judgment he richly deserves.

That’s why I believe most people want to believe there is some kind of judgment day coming.  We may laugh and make jokes about it, but I believe there is something inside us that likes the idea.  I think that’s what is behind a story I recently read.  I forget the source, but it was a Methodist minister talking about an interfaith conference he attended.  He asked a Muslim participant what was the most comforting aspect of his religion.  To his surprise, the man responded it was the Islamic teachings about judgment day.  Those teachings made him feel good, they gave him a sense of peace to know that no matter what happened in this world, that there would eventually be justice for all.  But on reflection, is it really surprising?  I believe much of our lives are lived out in the pursuit of justice, in the desire to see justice done.  We want judgment day to come. 

That’s what I think was behind the California recall election.  I don’t agree with those who sought it, but I think I understand their logic.  They don’t like the world the way it is.  They are looking for a way out.  They find it in the idea of condemning Mr. Davis.  If we just get rid of Grey Davis, went their logic, all will be right with the world.  It’s a procedure that was first described in the bible in the book of Leviticus (21-22)

And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness:  And the goat shall bear upon him all their iniquities unto a land not inhabited: and he shall let go the goat in the wilderness.

That’s where the term scapegoat comes from.  For the ancient Israelites it was a way of transferring all their problems unto a goat and sending it away.  But there’s an important difference between what the Israelites did and what we tend to do today.  I believe the Israelites knew they were performing a symbolic act.  Today, we don’t seem to realize that.  We believe if we can just pass judgment on someone we will be able to get rid of all of our problems.  I believe that idea – which grows out of apocalyptic and judgmental thinking – is a significant part of why we have witnessed such a profound polarization within our society today.  I believe it is also self-defeating – because when we think that kind of judgmental, scapegoating behavior is literally real, then we no longer have to deal with the real problems of the world – they will all be washed away by the kind of judgmental behavior that acts as if we can literally send a goat into the wilderness with our problems.

One of the solutions, of course, is to reject the idea of being judgmental.  Just accept people for what they are.  Don’t question, don’t judge, it isn’t nice.  As Jesus once said, judge not lest you be judged yourself.  I think that’s the tendency in liberal religion.  We’re too nice – or we want to think we’re too nice – to go around judging people.  But that sort of behavior has some unpleasant consequences.  Sometimes its trivial – as in the example I encountered about four years ago, when I overheard a conversation between a group of people from several different Unitarian churches.  One of them was explaining the practice in his church of allowing a member to play the piano for the service even though the person couldn’t play well and made frequent and glaring mistakes.  When another person asked why they allowed this, it was explained that the person insisted on playing and they allowed it because it showed how non-judgmental they were.  The person went on to make pointed remarks about the moral deficiencies of churches that would not allow this practice.  [This is a good time to point out that we are blessed with exceptional musicians in our church.] 

To be capriciously judgmental can be destructive, it can be a simplistic effort to blame a problems on a single person, group of people, or ethnic or religious group that we might avoid the difficult and dirty task of actually dealing with the challenges of life – be it in our home, our church, or the world.  But to avoid judgment can be just as destructive.  I believe the challenge is to find a way to be honest.  Most importantly, I believe the challenge is to find a way to be honest about ourselves – because – as Jesus said, we need to examine the beam in our own eye before turning to the speck in the eye of our neighbor.  This, I believe, is what lies behind something I heard recently about leadership. 

One of the primary characteristics of a leader is that he – or she – follows the rule of DWYSYWD – which means, “Do what you say you will do.”  First and foremost, a leader is a person who does what he says he will do.  But there’s a second part:  A leader is also a person who will hold others accountable to do what they say they will do.  A leader is a person who first judges himself or herself – and is then willing to judge others – but not in order to be judgmental, not in order to turn another person into a scapegoat to which one can attach all their problems.  The challenge is to be honest – the first and most important aspect of leadership – that we might learn from our mistakes, that we might know, honestly know, when we have done well, that we might honestly know when we need to change our path.  If we aren’t willing to do this, how can we ever hope to achieve our dreams?

Michael Durall, who some of you heard speak at a conference held here in Tulsa during March, is a Unitarian and a church consultant.  Wherever he goes he asks people what they yearn for in their church.  These are the answers he hears:

I wish my church changed lives or accomplished great things.

I wish we weren’t so well established in the middle of the road.

I yearn for a church that lives more boldly.

I wish my church had a more significant community impact.

The answers he hears resonate with another list – a list put together by Paul Wilke (Excellent Protestant Congregations) of the traits of excellent churches:

They share a vibrancy and excitement.  They are not bound by tradition, but view what they are doing as part of a continuum.  They constantly re-evaluate themselves by asking hard questions like, “Are we performing in a holy and honorable way?”

All of these statements are about churches – but couldn’t we also apply them to our own individual lives?  Isn’t it true that we yearn to live life boldly and to accomplish great things?  Don’t we want to have an impact on the world around us?  Aren’t we hungry to feel connected to the rest of life?  And most especially, don’t we have a human desire to feel that we are performing in a holy and honorable way?

I believe our church can never become what we want it to be, we can never become the people we want to be, unless we are willing to confront ourselves, to demand much of ourselves – and in turn, to demand much of others – not that we might blame someone else for our problems – not to create a scapegoat so we can pretend we have magically banished, or recalled, our problems – but to embrace our problems that we might learn from them and be the kind of people, have the kind of families, and become the kind of church that we want to be. 

“The world is full of judgment days,” said Emerson.  And he was right.  Every day is judgment day.  “’What has he done?’ is the divine question which searches men, and transpierces every false reputation.” . . . “Pretension never feigned an act of real greatness.  Pretension never wrote an Iliad, nor drove back Xerxes, nor christianized the world, nor abolished slavery.”  So if we are to avoid pretension, then let us embrace judgment – not as the Judgment Day of the apocalypse, but as the willingness to search our own souls, that our own souls might grow into greatness.

Amen.